CorrectTech Community Corrections Blog

Raymond Chip Tafrate, PhD, Damon Mitchell, PhD, & David J. Simourd, PhD

Raymond Chip Tafrate, PhD, a clinical psychologist, is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Central Connecticut State University. He is on the advisory board of the forensic special interest group for the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies and the editorial board for Criminal Justice and Behavior. Dr. Tafrate frequently consults with criminal justice agencies and has presented his research throughout North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. His most recent books are CBT with justice-involved clients: Interventions for antisocial and self-destructive behaviors (Guilford Press), Anger management for everyone (2nd ed.): Ten proven strategies to help you control anger and live a happier life (New Harbinger), and Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice (Wiley).

Damon Mitchell, PhD, a clinical psychologist, is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Central Connecticut State University. As a criminal justice consultant, Dr. Mitchell has developed and delivered training workshops related to forensic assessment and treatment and has conducted evaluations of criminal justice programs. He is on the editorial board for Criminal Justice and Behavior and his research has been published in journal articles and book chapters and presented at national and international conferences. His most recent books are CBT with justice-involved clients: Interventions for antisocial and self-destructive behaviors (Guilford Press) and Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice (Wiley).

David J. Simourd, PhD, CPsych, is in private practice in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and has been involved in forensic psychological assessment and treatment since 1992. In addition to his clinical work, Dr. Simourd has published articles, delivered training workshops, and served as a consultant on offender assessment and treatment to a variety of correctional organizations throughout North America, Asia, and the Caribbean. He is on the editorial board of Criminal Justice and Behavior and is a member of the Ontario Review Board, the civil commitment board for mentally disordered offenders in Ontario. He is a Fellow of the Canadian Psychological Association and shared the 2019 Significant Contribution Award with his co-authors for the book: CBT with justice-involved clients: Interventions for antisocial and self-destructive behaviors (Guilford Press).

Recent Posts

Risk Reduction: Be Positive

Posted by Raymond Chip Tafrate, PhD, Damon Mitchell, PhD, & David J. Simourd, PhD on 9/19/19 3:00 PM

What works and doesn’t work when using Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)?  This is something the authors, Raymond Chip Tafrate, PhD, Damon Mitchell, PhD, & David J. Simourd, PhD, of this blog series have spent a long time studying and have put all they’ve learned in the book: CBT with Justice-Involved Clients: Interventions for antisocial and self-destructive behaviors.  We thought our subscribers would be interested in a blog series on this content, knowing so many use or refer their clients to this type of treatment.  Therefore, we are pleased to announce this blog series on Adapting CBT for Justice-Involved Clients.

Let’s face it, much of what occurs in criminal justice is negative. Justice-involved clients (JICs) commit crimes that challenge our sense of right and wrong and safety in the world. They also might resist supervision and intervention that is mandated to them by the courts. These and other issues can create a negative bias against JICs and their ability to improve themselves. Additionally, the contemporary models of rehabilitation are based on risk reduction and risk models that get a bad rap. It can be common for community corrections officers and case managers to be reluctant to embrace a risk reduction perspective with JICs because it is viewed as intrinsically pessimistic and deficit-driven. Practitioners often say that working from a risk framework emphasizes client failures and problems, and the assessment process is simply a matter of adding up the number of risks a client has amassed. By extension, intervention is seen as establishing a set of avoidance goals based on those factors such as stay away from criminal companions and stop smoking pot. The reality is that risk-based models, when used effectively, offer a constructive perspective on client functioning, much more than just a checklist of JICs’ shortcomings. A shift towards a different, more multifaceted way of thinking about risk is often required to make these models useful for practitioners. We also suggest that risk models are the strategic heart of effective community corrections work.

Read More

Topics: risk, Criminal Justice Reform

Download Wall Chart!

Subscribe To Our Blog

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic

See all
Download Evidence Based Principles (EBP) Simplified